# Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-lite-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 53.4 to 38.5.
- Both cost about the same: $0.10 input and $0.40 output per million tokens.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 48.5 |
| Rank | 211 | 55 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.10 | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | 1504 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1637 |
| SciCode | — | 51.3% |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | 1482 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 12% |
| DTBench | 62.8% | — |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.94 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1373 | 1468 |
| ProofBench | — | 63% |
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | 1501 |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | 1259 |
| VPCT | 30% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1511 |
| LMArena French | 1388 | 1475 |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | 1409 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | 1456 |
| LMArena German | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1360 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1367 | 1463 |
| IFEval | 81% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1463 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1367 | 1400 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1366 | 1451 |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite lists at $0.10 and $0.40.

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1.05M tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.