# Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Llama 3-70B

> Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-lite-vs-llama-3-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3-70B in 1 category; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 35.5 to 12.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 62.8% for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and 54.2% for Llama 3-70B.
- Llama 3-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 36.4 | 28.5 |
| Rank | 208 | 317 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.10 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#167)
- Llama 3-70B: 35.3 (#215)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | 1206 |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 43.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.5% |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 72% |
| MBPP+ | — | 69% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 27.8 (#89)
- Llama 3-70B: 20.9 (#132)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | — |
| Cybench | — | 5% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 21.5 (#196)
- Llama 3-70B: 17.4 (#284)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | 35.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | 1195 |
| DTBench | 62.8% | 54.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.93 | 122.91 |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |
| WinoGrande | — | 83.5% |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 35.5 (#144)
- Llama 3-70B: 12.0 (#299)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1373 | 1218 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.3% |
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 22.6% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.1 (#206)
- Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#272)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | 1149 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |
| MMLU | — | 79.3% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.6 (#109)
- Llama 3-70B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | — |
| VPCT | 30% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.5 (#129)
- Llama 3-70B: 33.8 (#246)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1114 |
| LMArena French | 1388 | 1231 |
| LMArena German | 1390 | 1169 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | 1017 |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | 1017 |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | 1159 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | 1241 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.2 (#163)
- Llama 3-70B: 62.8 (#233)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1366 | 1194 |
| IFEval | 81% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#257)
- Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#235)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1174 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 57.0 (#130)
- Llama 3-70B: 43.0 (#225)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | 1221 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1366 | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1367 | 1223 |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Llama 3-70B?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 35.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Llama 3-70B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.