# Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Grok 4.7

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-lite-vs-grok-4-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.7 in 9 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.7 leads 40.1 to 21.5.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 500K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 36.4 | 46.6 |
| Rank | 208 | 56 |
| Context | 1.05M | 500K |
| Input $/M | $0.10 | $2 |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | $6 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#167)
- Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | 1423 |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1636 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.4% |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 27.8 (#89)
- Grok 4.7: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 21.5 (#196)
- Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | 1409 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |
| DTBench | 62.8% | — |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.93 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 35.5 (#144)
- Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1373 | 1393 |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.1 (#206)
- Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | 1413 |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.6 (#109)
- Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | — |
| VPCT | 30% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.5 (#129)
- Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1476 |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | 1396 |
| LMArena French | 1388 | — |
| LMArena German | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.2 (#163)
- Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1366 | 1406 |
| IFEval | 81% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#257)
- Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1416 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 57.0 (#130)
- Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1366 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1367 | 1389 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Grok 4.7?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Grok 4.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 500K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Grok 4.7 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 21.