# Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Grok 4.1

> Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-lite-vs-grok-4-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 1 category and Grok 4.1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4.1 leads 43.2 to 33.3.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 36.4 | 40.8 |
| Rank | 208 | 135 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.10 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#167)
- Grok 4.1: 33.4 (#246)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | 1445 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1214 |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 27.8 (#89)
- Grok 4.1: 33.8 (#47)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | — |
| Cybench | — | 39% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 21.5 (#196)
- Grok 4.1: 28.3 (#91)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | 1436 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | — |
| DTBench | 62.8% | — |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.93 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 35.5 (#144)
- Grok 4.1: 36.2 (#124)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1373 | 1422 |
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.1 (#206)
- Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#129)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | 1417 |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.6 (#109)
- Grok 4.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | — |
| VPCT | 30% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.5 (#129)
- Grok 4.1: 53.6 (#64)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | 1425 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1464 |
| LMArena French | 1388 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1390 | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | 1396 |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | 1407 |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | 1438 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.2 (#163)
- Grok 4.1: 74.0 (#106)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1366 | 1400 |
| IFEval | 81% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#257)
- Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#96)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1416 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 57.0 (#130)
- Grok 4.1: 62.6 (#71)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1366 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1367 | 1438 |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Grok 4.1?

Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Grok 4.1 better for coding?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Grok 4.1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.