# Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Granite 4.0 Micro

> Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 4.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-lite-vs-granite-4-0-micro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 5

## Summary

- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 5 categories and Granite 4.0 Micro in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 35.5 to 11.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Omni-MATH: 48% for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and 20.9% for Granite 4.0 Micro.
- Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.10 / $0.40 for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
- Granite 4.0 Micro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 36.4 | 28.8 |
| Rank | 208 | 312 |
| Context | 1.05M | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.10 | $0.017 |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | $0.11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#167)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 27.8 (#89)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 21.5 (#196)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: 18.5 (#261)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | — |
| DTBench | 62.8% | — |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.93 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 35.5 (#144)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: 11.2 (#301)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 48% | 20.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1373 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.1 (#206)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#299)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | 39.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | 30.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.6 (#109)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | — |
| VPCT | 30% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.5 (#129)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | — |
| LMArena French | 1388 | — |
| LMArena German | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.2 (#163)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: 70.0 (#164)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 81% | 84.9% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1366 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#257)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 57.0 (#130)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#212)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 81.8% | 67% |
| LMArena Text | 1379 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1366 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1367 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Granite 4.0 Micro?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 4.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Granite 4.0 Micro?

Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite lists at $0.10 and $0.40.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Granite 4.0 Micro share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 Micro has 8.