# Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs GLM-4.6V

> GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs 2.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.6V's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-lite-vs-glm-4-6v
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 2 categories and GLM-4.6V in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where GLM-4.6V leads 41.3 to 33.3.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $0.90 for GLM-4.6V.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 36.4 | 40.9 |
| Rank | 208 | 133 |
| Context | 1.05M | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.10 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | $0.90 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#167)
- GLM-4.6V: 40.2 (#128)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | 1390 |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 27.8 (#89)
- GLM-4.6V: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 21.5 (#196)
- GLM-4.6V: 26.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | 1368 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | — |
| DTBench | 62.8% | — |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.93 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 35.5 (#144)
- GLM-4.6V: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1373 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.1 (#206)
- GLM-4.6V: 37.4 (#148)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | 1372 |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.6 (#109)
- GLM-4.6V: 34.2 (#83)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | 1164 |
| VPCT | 30% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.5 (#129)
- GLM-4.6V: 48.8 (#135)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1426 |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | 1341 |
| LMArena French | 1388 | — |
| LMArena German | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.2 (#163)
- GLM-4.6V: 71.6 (#145)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1366 | 1351 |
| IFEval | 81% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#257)
- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#138)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1358 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 57.0 (#130)
- GLM-4.6V: 56.8 (#132)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1366 | 1347 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1367 | 1359 |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than GLM-4.6V?

GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs 2.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.6V's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or GLM-4.6V?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; GLM-4.6V lists at $0.30 and $0.90.

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or GLM-4.6V better for coding?

GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and GLM-4.6V share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6V has 12.