# Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 3 1B

> Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-5-flash-lite-vs-gemma-3-1b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 4 categories and Gemma 3 1B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 35.5 to 9.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard: 36.9% for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and 7.2% for Gemma 3 1B.
- Gemma 3 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 36.4 | 20.7 |
| Rank | 208 | 348 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.10 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#167)
- Gemma 3 1B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 27.8 (#89)
- Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | 7.2% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 21.5 (#196)
- Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | — |
| DTBench | 62.8% | — |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.93 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 35.5 (#144)
- Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1373 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.1 (#206)
- Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 19.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.6 (#109)
- Gemma 3 1B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | — |
| VPCT | 30% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.5 (#129)
- Gemma 3 1B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | — |
| LMArena French | 1388 | — |
| LMArena German | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.2 (#163)
- Gemma 3 1B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 81% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1366 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#257)
- Gemma 3 1B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 57.0 (#130)
- Gemma 3 1B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1366 | — |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1367 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Gemma 3 1B?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Gemma 3 1B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 1B has 4.