# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Yi-Lightning

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-yi-lightning
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Yi-Lightning in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 37.8 to 27.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 35.6% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 12.9% for Yi-Lightning.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 37.1 |
| Rank | 173 | 209 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
- Yi-Lightning: 27.4 (#320)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | 12.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1312 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
- Yi-Lightning: 25.9 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1302 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
- Yi-Lightning: 36.2 (#172)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1300 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
- Yi-Lightning: 35.4 (#185)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1286 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Yi-Lightning: 42.2 (#196)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1320 |
| LMArena French | — | 1305 |
| LMArena German | — | 1267 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1228 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1315 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
- Yi-Lightning: 67.4 (#196)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1278 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
- Yi-Lightning: 39.4 (#181)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1297 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
- Yi-Lightning: 50.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1302 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1280 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1311 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Yi-Lightning?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Yi-Lightning better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Yi-Lightning share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Lightning has 18.