# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Yi-1.5-34B

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-yi-1-5-34b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 36.5 to 14.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 25.5% for Yi-1.5-34B.
- Yi-1.5-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 30.2 |
| Rank | 171 | 286 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- Yi-1.5-34B: 31.9 (#267)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1169 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.8% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- Yi-1.5-34B: 21.5 (#195)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1160 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- Yi-1.5-34B: 25.3 (#248)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 25.5% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1182 |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#290)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 32% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1144 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Yi-1.5-34B: 32.5 (#251)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1213 |
| LMArena French | — | 1155 |
| LMArena German | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1021 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1005 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1120 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- Yi-1.5-34B: 59.4 (#252)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1139 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#243)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1144 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- Yi-1.5-34B: 37.6 (#252)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1153 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Yi-1.5-34B?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Yi-1.5-34B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.