# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Wizardlm 13b

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 52.7 to 30.7.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 171 | 272 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1035 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1018 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1017 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1023 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1049 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1047 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Wizardlm 13b?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Wizardlm 13b share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.