# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-tulu-3-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 14.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 42.7% for Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B.
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 33.0 |
| Rank | 173 | 251 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1235 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1220 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 42.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.4% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1242 |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 46.3% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1246 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1233 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1224 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.