# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Step 3.5 Flash

> Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-step-3-5-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in long context, where Step 3.5 Flash leads 42.8 to 29.2.
- Step 3.5 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 42.3 |
| Rank | 173 | 116 |
| Context | — | 256K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 42.4 (#105)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1436 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 22.2 (#202)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 28.4% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1411 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 42.6 (#84)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 66.8% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1408 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 39.6 (#132)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1421 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Step 3.5 Flash: 50.5 (#119)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1447 |
| LMArena French | — | 1421 |
| LMArena German | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1354 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1352 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1385 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1419 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 73.1 (#124)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1385 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#117)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1402 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 58.8 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1403 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1357 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1405 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Step 3.5 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.