# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 39.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 36.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 82.3% for Qwen3.7 Flash.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 39.5 |
| Rank | 171 | 152 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 144.62 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 82.3% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 39.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.