# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen3.5 Plus

> Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-qwen3-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Plus in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 42.9 to 29.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 84.8% for Qwen3.5 Plus.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 42.3 |
| Rank | 171 | 103 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.0 (#67)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 146.79 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 47.9 (#55)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#78)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 42.9 (#109)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.