# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen3-4B

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-qwen3-4b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3-4B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 37.1 to 28.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 52.3% for Qwen3-4B.
- Qwen3-4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 31.5 |
| Rank | 171 | 261 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 52.2% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 52.3% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Qwen3-4B?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen3-4B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.