# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-qwen2-5-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 12.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 35.5% for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 29.0 |
| Rank | 173 | 320 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.17 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 36.5 (#208)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.1% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.8 (#124)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.8 (#322)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 118.51 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 12.6 (#306)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.5% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.4% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#286)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 35.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.9% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 34.1% |
| MMLU | — | 72.9% |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.2 (#231)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| IFEval | — | 74.1% |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#195)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | — | 73.1% |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.