# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen Plus

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen Plus in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 23.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 65.3% for Qwen Plus.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 37.1 |
| Rank | 173 | 210 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
- Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1328 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
- Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1317 |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
- Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 65.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1326 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 48.1% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1323 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
- Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1303 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1324 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
- Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1336 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Qwen Plus?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen Plus share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.