# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Olmo 7b Instruct

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-olmo-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 52.7 to 26.0.
- Olmo 7b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 171 | 293 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.1 (#298)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1016 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.0 (#273)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 993 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 27.8 (#234)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1018 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.1 (#286)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1013 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 946 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.3 (#296)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 978 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 26.0 (#298)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1007 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.