# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs o1

> o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-o1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and o1 in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where o1 leads 50.3 to 29.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 41.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 83.3% for o1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 40.6 |
| Rank | 171 | 140 |
| Context | — | 200K |
| Input $/M | — | $15 |
| Output $/M | — | $60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- o1: 45.7 (#64)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | 61.7% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | 69.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 47.6% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1367 |
| CadEval | — | 56% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 80.2% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- o1: 24.3 (#111)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 51.1% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- o1: 27.5 (#103)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | 5.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | 91.6% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | 65.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 141.92 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | 75.7% |
| SimpleBench | — | 41.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 30.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 15% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1372 |
| DTBench | — | 74.7% |
| LMCA | — | 22.3% |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- o1: 34.9 (#150)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | 80.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 94.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 14.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1388 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 9.3% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- o1: 41.5 (#101)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 76.8% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | 11.7% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1362 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- o1: 33.6 (#87)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1168 |
| GeoBench | — | 80% |
| VPCT | — | 37% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 41.4% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- o1: 48.8 (#137)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1394 |
| LMArena French | — | 1343 |
| LMArena German | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1345 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- o1: 75.0 (#82)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | 81.5% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1368 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- o1: 50.3 (#9)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | 83.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1378 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- o1: 55.8 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | 65.4% |
| LMArena Text | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1347 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 70.2% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1368 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than o1?

o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or o1 better for coding?

o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.7 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and o1 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.