# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.2

> Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-muse-spark-1-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 50.4 to 21.6.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 49.8 |
| Rank | 171 | 44 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $4.25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 48.6 (#49)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 54.9% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1532 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 12% |
| SciCode | — | 56.4% |
| WeirdML | — | 60.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1497 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Muse Spark 1.2: 29.5 (#77)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 36.4% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 16% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 50.4 (#32)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 155.18 |
| SimpleBench | — | 74.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.2% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1490 |
| DTBench | — | 94.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 48.4% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 43.8 (#68)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 43% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 53.9 (#49)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 60.3% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1485 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Muse Spark 1.2: 42.6 (#24)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1304 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Muse Spark 1.2: 57.4 (#10)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1479 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1519 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1494 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 77.1 (#30)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1466 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 45.4 (#35)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1483 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 72.6 (#14)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1486 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1444 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1840 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1504 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 28.