# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Mixtral 8x7B

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-mixtral-8x7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Mixtral 8x7B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 36.5 to 11.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 10% for Mixtral 8x7B.
- Mixtral 8x7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 27.1 |
| Rank | 173 | 334 |
| Context | — | 32K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
- Mixtral 8x7B: 32.8 (#269)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1126 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 39.6% |
| MBPP+ | — | 49.7% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
- Mixtral 8x7B: 18.2 (#285)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 118.47 |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1115 |
| DTBench | — | 49.6% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.2% |
| ForecastBench | — | 56.3 |
| HellaSwag | — | 86.7% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
| PIQA | — | 83.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 77.2% |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
- Mixtral 8x7B: 18.8 (#289)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 10% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 10.5% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1147 |
| GSM8K | — | 74.4% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
- Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#301)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 30.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 33.5% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 29.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1088 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 87.3% |
| MMLU | — | 70.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 85.8% |
| TriviaQA | — | 82.2% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Mixtral 8x7B: 29.6 (#266)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1077 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1055 |
| LMArena French | — | 1166 |
| LMArena German | — | 1114 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 931 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 968 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1090 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1111 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
- Mixtral 8x7B: 51.0 (#297)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| IFEval | — | 57.5% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1109 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
- Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#260)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1103 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
- Mixtral 8x7B: 34.2 (#270)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1132 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1109 |
| WildBench | — | 67.3% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1115 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Mixtral 8x7B?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Mixtral 8x7B better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 32.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Mixtral 8x7B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x7B has 38.