# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Mistral

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-mistral
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 75.6 to 52.9.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 29.4 |
| Rank | 171 | 297 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- Mistral: 33.2 (#249)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1162 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- Mistral: 21.3 (#199)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1149 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- Mistral: 20.5 (#275)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 7.2% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1180 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- Mistral: 16.3 (#283)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 27.7% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1125 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Mistral: 33.0 (#249)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1129 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1109 |
| LMArena French | — | 1179 |
| LMArena German | — | 1155 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1012 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1032 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1168 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1143 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- Mistral: 52.9 (#283)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| IFEval | — | 56.8% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1152 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- Mistral: 35.0 (#240)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1154 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- Mistral: 37.2 (#255)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1165 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1158 |
| WildBench | — | 66% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1147 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Mistral?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Mistral better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 33.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Mistral share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.