# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Mistral Small 3.1

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-mistral-small-3-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Mistral Small 3.1 in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 37.1 to 13.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 41.9% for Mistral Small 3.1.
- Mistral Small 3.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 171 | 263 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.56 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 37.7 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1309 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 18.9 (#249)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 127.48 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1278 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 13.7 (#295)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 3.9% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 24.8% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1261 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#266)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 41.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 61% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 39.2% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1258 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Mistral Small 3.1: 32.6 (#93)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1136 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Mistral Small 3.1: 41.4 (#204)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1254 |
| LMArena French | — | 1270 |
| LMArena German | — | 1266 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1210 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1283 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 63.8 (#225)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| IFEval | — | 75% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1264 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#172)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1300 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 37.2 (#254)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1278 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1253 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 761 |
| WildBench | — | 78.8% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1270 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Mistral Small 3.1?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Mistral Small 3.1 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (37.4 vs 37.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Mistral Small 3.1 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.1 has 28.