# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Mistral Medium 3.5

> Gemini 2.0 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 39.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-mistral-medium-3-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 43.2 to 29.1.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 39.6 |
| Rank | 171 | 151 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $7.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1263 |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1461 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 141.42 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 41.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 12.9% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1436 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1432 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1431 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1222 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1443 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1453 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1406 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1414 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1414 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1421 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1372 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 993 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1423 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Mistral Medium 3.5?

Gemini 2.0 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 39.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 35.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.