# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs MiniMax-M3

> MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-minimax-m3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M3 leads 58.4 to 36.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 90.9% for MiniMax-M3.
- MiniMax-M3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 43.5 |
| Rank | 171 | 81 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- MiniMax-M3: 41.5 (#111)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | — | 14.7% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1482 |
| SciCode | — | 47.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1470 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 640.02 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M3: 22.5 (#121)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.7% |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 4.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 2,158 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- MiniMax-M3: 29.3 (#83)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 147 |
| SimpleBench | — | 45.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 65.1% |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 14% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1447 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 8% |
| DTBench | — | 78.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 33.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 55% |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.4 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- MiniMax-M3: 39.1 (#83)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 71.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 18% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1432 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#32)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 90.9% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1462 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M3: 39.5 (#45)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1435 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M3: 53.2 (#70)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1465 |
| LMArena French | — | 1445 |
| LMArena German | — | 1424 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1381 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1372 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1430 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1431 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- MiniMax-M3: 75.7 (#56)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1433 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#68)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1445 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- MiniMax-M3: 62.3 (#79)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1433 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1405 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1150 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1441 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than MiniMax-M3?

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?

MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and MiniMax-M3 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.