# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs MiniMax-M2.7

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-minimax-m2-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 43.3 to 29.1.
- MiniMax-M2.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 37.4 |
| Rank | 171 | 188 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 41.4 (#115)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1397 |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 37% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1454 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#103)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 19.0 (#248)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 145.84 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 24.7% |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1422 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#254)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1420 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 37.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1443 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 50.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1439 |
| LMArena French | — | 1422 |
| LMArena German | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1261 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1403 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 74.2 (#101)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1404 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#94)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1419 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 59.1 (#107)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1413 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than MiniMax-M2.7?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.