# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs MiniMax-M2.1

> Gemini 2.0 Pro and MiniMax-M2.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 38.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-minimax-m2-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in long context, where MiniMax-M2.1 leads 43.2 to 29.1.
- MiniMax-M2.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 38.4 |
| Rank | 171 | 177 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 40.1 (#132)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1384 |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1421 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 623.83 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: 27.7 (#91)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 36.6% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 15.8 (#301)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 11.2% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1410 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 35.6 (#142)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 37.7 (#143)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 11.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1432 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: 50.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1378 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1430 |
| LMArena French | — | 1405 |
| LMArena German | — | 1380 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1297 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1396 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 74.0 (#108)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1399 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#98)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 58.5 (#114)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1362 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1396 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than MiniMax-M2.1?

Gemini 2.0 Pro and MiniMax-M2.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 38.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or MiniMax-M2.1 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and MiniMax-M2.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.1 has 22.