# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2-Omni

> MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-mimo-v2-omni
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in long context, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 44.1 to 29.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 171 | 91 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1467 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1445 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1432 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1449 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1469 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1318 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1432 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1428 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1424 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1446 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.