# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in long context, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 43.0 to 29.2.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 173 | 138 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1443 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1420 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1425 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1462 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1392 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1404 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.