# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.1 to 22.3.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 50.3 |
| Rank | 173 | 49 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1534 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1512 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1494 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1543 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1480 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1493 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1501 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1464 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.