# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

> MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in long context, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 45.4 to 29.2.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 45.2 |
| Rank | 173 | 74 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1479 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1503 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1488 |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 22% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1481 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1503 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1507 |
| LMArena French | — | 1488 |
| LMArena German | — | 1458 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1437 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1471 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1477 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1483 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1440 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1477 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.