# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Magistral Small

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-magistral-small
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Magistral Small in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 21.6 to 6.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 56.1% for Magistral Small.
- Magistral Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 29.9 |
| Rank | 171 | 289 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- Magistral Small: 37.8 (#172)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| SciCode | — | 35.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- Magistral Small: 6.9 (#345)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 133.19 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 6.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 3% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| DTBench | — | 61.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- Magistral Small: 24.9 (#253)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- Magistral Small: 30.9 (#215)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 56.1% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Magistral Small?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Magistral Small better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (37.4 vs 37.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Magistral Small share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.