# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Longcat Flash Chat

> Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-longcat-flash-chat
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in long context, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 43.5 to 29.2.
- Longcat Flash Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meituan |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 42.1 |
| Rank | 173 | 120 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1471 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 43.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 17.7% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1440 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1442 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1454 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1465 |
| LMArena French | — | 1456 |
| LMArena German | — | 1408 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1373 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1445 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1411 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1425 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1418 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Longcat Flash Chat?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Longcat Flash Chat share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.