# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-llama2-70b-steerlm-chat
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 75.5 to 54.2.
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 31.8 |
| Rank | 173 | 268 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1025 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1047 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1072 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1063 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1060 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 998 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1098 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1058 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.