# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Llama 4 Maverick

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-llama-4-maverick
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 4 Maverick in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 52.7 to 39.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 35.6% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 15.6% for Llama 4 Maverick.
- Llama 4 Maverick has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 30.6 |
| Rank | 171 | 276 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.19 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.65 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- Llama 4 Maverick: 26.3 (#318)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | 15.6% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 21% |
| SciCode | — | 33.1% |
| WeirdML | — | 24.5% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49.7% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1302 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 61.4% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 172.97 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Llama 4 Maverick: 27.9 (#86)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 37.3% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- Llama 4 Maverick: 10.1 (#337)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | 0.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 132.2 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| SimpleBench | — | 27.7% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 55.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 4.4% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1281 |
| DTBench | — | 61.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 15.9% |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- Llama 4 Maverick: 24.6 (#256)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 73% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 20.6% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 42.2% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1299 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0.7% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- Llama 4 Maverick: 33.3 (#196)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 67% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | 22.6% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 5.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 81% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 8.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 65% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1259 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Llama 4 Maverick: 30.9 (#100)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1141 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 31.8% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Llama 4 Maverick: 42.4 (#190)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1277 |
| LMArena French | — | 1258 |
| LMArena German | — | 1291 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1203 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1286 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1293 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- Llama 4 Maverick: 71.9 (#140)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| IFEval | — | 90.8% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1267 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- Llama 4 Maverick: 31.4 (#274)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | 46.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1280 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- Llama 4 Maverick: 39.0 (#247)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1266 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 62% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 860 |
| WildBench | — | 80% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1289 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Llama 4 Maverick?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Llama 4 Maverick better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 26.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Llama 4 Maverick share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Maverick has 54.