# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Llama 3-8B

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 25.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-llama-3-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 3-8B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 37.1 to 8.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 6.1% for Llama 3-8B.
- Llama 3-8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 25.3 |
| Rank | 171 | 338 |
| Context | — | 8K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- Llama 3-8B: 30.5 (#285)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 31.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1152 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 36.9% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 56.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 54.8% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- Llama 3-8B: 13.8 (#321)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 116.33 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1133 |
| DTBench | — | 43.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 57.3% |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.6 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 75.7% |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- Llama 3-8B: 8.3 (#317)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 6.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.9% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1151 |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#303)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 26.1% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1113 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 82.8% |
| MMLU | — | 68.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 82.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 67.7% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#256)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1098 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1076 |
| LMArena French | — | 1158 |
| LMArena German | — | 1104 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 967 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1003 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1109 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1172 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- Llama 3-8B: 58.7 (#255)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1127 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#246)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1128 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- Llama 3-8B: 37.7 (#251)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1150 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1152 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Llama 3-8B?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 25.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Llama 3-8B better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Llama 3-8B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-8B has 34.