# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Llama 3.1-70B

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-llama-3-1-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 3.1-70B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 13.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 36.7% for Llama 3.1-70B.
- Llama 3.1-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 29.6 |
| Rank | 173 | 308 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 30.3 (#296)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 46.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1260 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.8% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Llama 3.1-70B: 25.1 (#112)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 6.9% |
| BALROG | — | 27.9% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 21.6 (#220)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 125.92 |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1241 |
| DTBench | — | 60% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 14.8% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 13.5 (#304)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 36.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 3.6% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 21% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1252 |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 24.2 (#269)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 44.2% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 42.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1209 |
| MMLU | — | 80.1% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Llama 3.1-70B: 38.8 (#225)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1219 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1215 |
| LMArena French | — | 1261 |
| LMArena German | — | 1222 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1132 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1140 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1234 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1253 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 65.3 (#223)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| IFEval | — | 82.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1231 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 37.6 (#214)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1241 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
- Llama 3.1-70B: 35.4 (#267)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1261 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1232 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 784 |
| WildBench | — | 75.8% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1256 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Llama 3.1-70B?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Llama 3.1-70B better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Llama 3.1-70B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-70B has 35.