# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Llama 13b

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-llama-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 52.7 to 13.9.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 23.9 |
| Rank | 171 | 344 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 683 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 100.09 |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 728 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 838 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 819 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 781 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 753 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Llama 13b?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Llama 13b better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Llama 13b share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.