# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-kimi-k2-thinking-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 36.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 84.2% for Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo.
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 45.4 |
| Rank | 171 | 63 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.1 (#166)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1322 |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1454 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 31.4 (#72)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1428 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 45.5 (#62)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1429 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#64)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 84.2% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1439 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.6 (#104)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1457 |
| LMArena French | — | 1425 |
| LMArena German | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1329 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1407 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.2 (#103)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1403 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1415 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1373 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1414 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (37.4 vs 38.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.