# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Hy3

> Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-hy3
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in long context, where Hy3 leads 44.1 to 29.2.
- Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 44.2 |
| Rank | 173 | 79 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.13 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.53 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
- Hy3: 46.8 (#63)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1508 |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1464 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
- Hy3: 26.1 (#136)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 41.2% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1447 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
- Hy3: 40.1 (#93)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1475 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
- Hy3: 40.8 (#114)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1460 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Hy3: 53.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1426 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1493 |
| LMArena French | — | 1461 |
| LMArena German | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1432 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1456 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
- Hy3: 75.1 (#70)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1426 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
- Hy3: 44.1 (#75)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
- Hy3: 62.2 (#81)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1436 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Hy3?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Hy3 better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Hy3 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 19.