# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

> Gemini 2.0 Pro and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 38.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-hunyuan-large
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in long context, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 40.8 to 29.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 38.0 |
| Rank | 171 | 183 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1307 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1286 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1281 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1276 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1266 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1277 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1342 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1284 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

Gemini 2.0 Pro and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 38.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (37.4 vs 37.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.