# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Grok 4 Fast

> Gemini 2.0 Pro and Grok 4 Fast score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 39.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-grok-4-fast
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Grok 4 Fast in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 Fast leads 63.2 to 29.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 41.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 94.4% for Grok 4 Fast.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 39.0 |
| Rank | 171 | 164 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- Grok 4 Fast: 32.3 (#264)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1160 |
| WeirdML | — | 42.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1429 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Grok 4 Fast: 29.3 (#80)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 15.7% |
| Cybench | — | 30% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1171 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- Grok 4 Fast: 22.5 (#179)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 144.21 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 5.3% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 66.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 48.5% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1413 |
| DTBench | — | 82.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.5 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- Grok 4 Fast: 36.1 (#126)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1419 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- Grok 4 Fast: 31.5 (#211)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 19.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1411 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Grok 4 Fast: 51.5 (#106)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1458 |
| LMArena French | — | 1433 |
| LMArena German | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1359 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1414 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- Grok 4 Fast: 73.4 (#116)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1388 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | 94.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1415 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- Grok 4 Fast: 60.2 (#96)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1407 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1414 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Grok 4 Fast?

Gemini 2.0 Pro and Grok 4 Fast score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 39.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Grok 4 Fast better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Grok 4 Fast share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 Fast has 30.