# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Grok 4.7

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-grok-4-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and Grok 4.7 in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.7 leads 49.1 to 22.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 92.7% for Grok 4.7.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 53.1 |
| Rank | 173 | 37 |
| Context | — | 500K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
- Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | — | 47.6% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1639 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1427 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 54.6% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 22.8% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 10,537 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
- Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 153.53 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 18% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 38% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1413 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 29% |
| DTBench | — | 96% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 49.4% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
- Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 53% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 17.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 98.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1407 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
- Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 92.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 56% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1422 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 32.5% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1455 |
| LMArena French | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1400 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
- Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1404 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
- Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1413 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
- Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1391 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1393 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Grok 4.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Grok 4.7 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 39.