# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Grok 4.6

> Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-grok-4-6
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and Grok 4.6 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.6 leads 61.3 to 21.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 94% for Grok 4.6.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 56.8 |
| Rank | 171 | 19 |
| Context | — | 500K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- Grok 4.6: 58.0 (#14)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 67.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 48% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| CursorBench | — | 41.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1620 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 25.3% |
| SciCode | — | 56.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 67.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1464 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,508 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#25)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 65.3% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 17.2% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 9,047 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- Grok 4.6: 61.3 (#18)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 156.48 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 67.1% |
| SimpleBench | — | 75.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 80% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 87.5% |
| CritPt | — | 19.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 40% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| EBR-Bench | — | 30.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1445 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 34% |
| DTBench | — | 97.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 48.5% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- Grok 4.6: 66.8 (#19)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 66% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 31.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 99.2% |
| ProofBench | — | 51% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1416 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#18)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 94% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 49.3% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1463 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Grok 4.6: 43.9 (#18)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1265 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 33.2% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 40% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1452 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Grok 4.6: 53.3 (#67)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1422 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1479 |
| LMArena French | — | 1458 |
| LMArena German | — | 1425 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1408 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- Grok 4.6: 75.6 (#59)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1431 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- Grok 4.6: 44.4 (#62)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1453 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- Grok 4.6: 62.5 (#77)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1430 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1422 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Grok 4.6 better for coding?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Grok 4.6 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.6 has 49.