# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Grok 4.1

> Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-grok-4-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4.1 leads 43.2 to 29.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 40.8 |
| Rank | 171 | 135 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- Grok 4.1: 33.4 (#246)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1214 |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1445 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Grok 4.1: 33.8 (#47)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 39% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- Grok 4.1: 28.3 (#91)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1436 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- Grok 4.1: 36.2 (#124)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1422 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#129)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1417 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Grok 4.1: 53.6 (#64)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1425 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1464 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1407 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1438 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- Grok 4.1: 74.0 (#106)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1400 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#96)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- Grok 4.1: 62.6 (#71)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1438 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Grok 4.1?

Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Grok 4.1 better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Grok 4.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.