# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Grok-2 (Dec 2024)

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-grok-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 20.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 63.5% for Grok-2 (Dec 2024).

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 33.7 |
| Rank | 173 | 239 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
- Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | 46.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 22.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1287 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
- Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | 54.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | 54.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 130.48 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | 54.3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 22.7% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1272 |
| DTBench | — | 65.2% |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
- Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | 54.9% |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 63.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 11.5% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1283 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0.7% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
- Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 53.8% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | 20.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1254 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1289 |
| LMArena French | — | 1318 |
| LMArena German | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1244 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1237 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1286 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1281 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
- Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | 69.6% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1270 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
- Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1276 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
- Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | 45.6% |
| LMArena Text | — | 1305 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1284 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 63.6% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1290 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Grok-2 (Dec 2024)?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34.