# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GPT-6 Luna

> GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-gpt-6-luna
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and GPT-6 Luna in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6 Luna leads 76.1 to 39.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 90.5% for GPT-6 Luna.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 53.3 |
| Rank | 173 | 36 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
- GPT-6 Luna: 55.5 (#25)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 66.6% |
| FrontierCode | — | 42.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1581 |
| SciCode | — | 54.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1439 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,577 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- GPT-6 Luna: 33.3 (#54)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 44.3% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 23% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
- GPT-6 Luna: 48.2 (#41)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 156.28 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 59.3% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 68.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 86.7% |
| CritPt | — | 19.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 31% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1411 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 90.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 44.5% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
- GPT-6 Luna: 76.1 (#15)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 78.9% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 56.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 98.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 64% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1416 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
- GPT-6 Luna: 57.0 (#41)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 90.5% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.4% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1444 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- GPT-6 Luna: 42.4 (#30)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1217 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 31.2% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 44.2% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- GPT-6 Luna: 50.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1433 |
| LMArena French | — | 1420 |
| LMArena German | — | 1369 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1369 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1360 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1394 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1393 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
- GPT-6 Luna: 74.3 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1409 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
- GPT-6 Luna: 43.0 (#111)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
- GPT-6 Luna: 58.3 (#119)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1391 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1396 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or GPT-6 Luna better for coding?

GPT-6 Luna scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and GPT-6 Luna share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Luna has 42.