# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GPT-5.4 mini

> GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-gpt-5-4-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and GPT-5.4 mini in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5.4 mini leads 51.4 to 36.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 86.9% for GPT-5.4 mini.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 44.8 |
| Rank | 171 | 69 |
| Context | — | 400K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.75 |
| Output $/M | — | $4.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- GPT-5.4 mini: 45.0 (#67)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | — | 27% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1397 |
| SciCode | — | 49.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 60.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1438 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,189 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- GPT-5.4 mini: 29.6 (#74)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 36.3% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- GPT-5.4 mini: 30.3 (#77)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 148.83 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 18.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 37.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 61.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 63.7% |
| CritPt | — | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 61.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1424 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 11% |
| DTBench | — | 80% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 40.8% |
| ForecastBench | — | 57 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- GPT-5.4 mini: 45.4 (#63)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 51.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 9.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 88.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 21% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1418 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 28.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- GPT-5.4 mini: 51.4 (#62)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 86.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 29.4% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.5% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1434 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- GPT-5.4 mini: 39.0 (#51)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1245 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- GPT-5.4 mini: 52.1 (#94)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1446 |
| LMArena French | — | 1440 |
| LMArena German | — | 1407 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1375 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1369 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1403 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- GPT-5.4 mini: 74.3 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1405 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- GPT-5.4 mini: 42.9 (#107)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1407 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- GPT-5.4 mini: 64.2 (#56)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-5.4 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1370 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1665 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1429 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than GPT-5.4 mini?

GPT-5.4 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or GPT-5.4 mini better for coding?

GPT-5.4 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.0 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and GPT-5.4 mini share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 mini has 46.