# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GPT-4.5

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 36.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-gpt-4-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and GPT-4.5 in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where GPT-4.5 leads 40.4 to 29.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 41.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 63.9% for GPT-4.5.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 36.9 |
| Rank | 171 | 200 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- GPT-4.5: 41.8 (#102)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | 44.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | 75.2% |
| WeirdML | — | 39.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1397 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- GPT-4.5: 27.6 (#92)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 17.5% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- GPT-4.5: 14.1 (#320)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | 3.2% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | 71.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | 64.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 136.74 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | 69% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 34.5% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 10.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1404 |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.7 |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- GPT-4.5: 31.0 (#200)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | 69.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 78.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 37.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1412 |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- GPT-4.5: 32.4 (#205)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 68.7% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | 13.6% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 5.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1394 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- GPT-4.5: 37.0 (#68)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1195 |
| VPCT | — | 45% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- GPT-4.5: 52.7 (#78)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1421 |
| LMArena French | — | 1417 |
| LMArena German | — | 1457 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1419 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- GPT-4.5: 72.8 (#129)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | 72.3% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1404 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#150)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | 63.9% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1406 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- GPT-4.5: 57.1 (#129)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | 61.5% |
| LMArena Text | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1394 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 75.6% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1258 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1444 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than GPT-4.5?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 36.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or GPT-4.5 better for coding?

GPT-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and GPT-4.5 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.5 has 42.