# Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GPT-4.1 mini

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-pro-vs-gpt-4-1-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 5

## Summary

- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and GPT-4.1 mini in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 37.1 to 23.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 33.5 |
| Rank | 171 | 232 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 30.4 (#286)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | 32.4% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 23.9% |
| SciCode | — | 40.4% |
| WeirdML | — | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 48.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1367 |
| CadEval | — | 16% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- GPT-4.1 mini: 33.0 (#52)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 50.5% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 10.9 (#335)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 135.01 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 48.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 3.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 7% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1349 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 68.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 21.1% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 23.1 (#264)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 87.3% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 6.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 44.7% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 49.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1343 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 4.5% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#183)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 65.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 12.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.3% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 61.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1338 |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- GPT-4.1 mini: 35.2 (#77)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1181 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
- GPT-4.1 mini: 45.9 (#161)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1318 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1329 |
| LMArena French | — | 1357 |
| LMArena German | — | 1349 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1291 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1298 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1324 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1319 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 73.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| IFEval | — | 90.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1332 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#270)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | 44.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1344 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
- GPT-4.1 mini: 48.8 (#193)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4.1 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1341 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1300 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1147 |
| WildBench | — | 83.8% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1354 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than GPT-4.1 mini?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or GPT-4.1 mini better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 30.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and GPT-4.1 mini share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.1 mini has 47.